There are so many footguns in MacOS for developing standard *NIX software that it makes my head spin. MacOS suffers the same issue, but more for the development crowd. People like having options, and taking away your Linuxulator and Bluetooth modules doesn't make for a super enticing desktop experience. If they give you less capabilities with each update and say it's making you safer, I don't think I'd take their word entirely at face value maybe security is part of the motivation, but almost certainly not the entire story.Īs for OpenBSD? I actually like their approach for the most part, but there's a reason it's still a fairly niche OS. They say they've built the fastest GPU and then backpedal when it gets benchmarked. They say they're protecting user privacy by hashing your cloud photos with a neural network. and nothing to do with restricting user freedomīut how exactly can we prove that? Apple says one thing and does another. If they control their hardware and software experience end-to-end, then they control the users too. Apple now directly competes with companies like Spotify, Netflix, Hulu, Microsoft, Meta, the list goes on for days. I also don't think this is about security as much as it's about control. Well, the discussion is the Apple ecosystem, not just Mac, and in that sense the App Store does prevent you from ingesting third-party software or running arbitrary code on your own device. > Emphasis mine - what is the functionality trade-off that you're referring to? The App Store has never stopped me from running any app from outside the App Store. I'd love a RISC-V laptop as much as the next guy, I think this is more about Apple increasing their profit margins by re-using their ISA licensing from their phones/tablets. No matter how you frame it, x86 is still the performance and compatibility king. However, jumping from one proprietary ISA to another, slower one doesn't exactly make sense to me. We need to be transitioning to open ISAs, so getting off x86 isn't something I disagree with. > Well I'm hoping we're finally getting the shove to move off x86, there's nothing particularly exciting about the architecture itself. Some of these have been a bit annoying, but reading this as removing user freedom seems like mis-interpreting the intent. OpenBSD has always been making broadly similar moves: securelevel, signing packages, pledge/unveil, removing support for loadable kernel modules, removing unmaintained/insecure subsystems (Linux emulation, Bluetooth). I would agree that macOS is continuously getting a bit less hackable over time (how do you authorise cron to access the downloads folder.), but this has very clearly everything to do with the half-assed attempts at making the system more secure (a very noble and respectable goal), and nothing to do with restricting user freedom (after you factor in incompetence, carelessness, and ignorance). > the walled garden and the Appstore lockdown to protect their cash cow are coming at the expense of functionality Įmphasis mine - what is the functionality trade-off that you're referring to? The App Store has never stopped me from running any app from outside the App Store. I'm excited because displacing x86 is also a stepping stone for RISC-V, and might push various vendors to consider making their software more portable - which would be a win for literally everyone. Well I'm hoping we're finally getting the shove to move off x86, there's nothing particularly exciting about the architecture itself, and we're finally getting a tangible proof that the compatibility layer has a huge price tag. > Hoping the next gen of x86 chips finally hit that sweet spot of performance/low power/heat. The story of the iPad is that Apple is shipping hardware vastly more capable than it's software. That MacBook will also allow me to run multiple apps alongside Safari and be far more productive than the iPad we’re well past the point when Apple needs to figure out proper multitasking on its tablet. On raw benchmarks the iPad Air 2 is comparable to a 2011 MacBook Air - which, again, is crazy - but the MacBook’s version of Safari is vastly more feature-rich and flexible. > Just consider something as simple as browsing the web. Apple has all but stopped adding tablet-specific features to iOS - the minor two-paned mode for landscape apps on the iPhone 6 Plus is a more significant rethinking of how to manage a larger screen size than anything added to the iPad Air 2 this year. The overall experience of using the iPad Air 2 in 2014 is a case study in missed opportunities and untapped potential. If the hardware of the iPad Air 2 demonstrates the overwhelming power of small iterative improvements, then the software represents the failings of that approach.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |